Archive for February, 2010
Message over method?
I’ve lived most of my professional career operating under the following guideline:
‘Our methods may change, but our message never will.’
It really sounds good doesn’t it? Being able to say with conviction that we’ll use exciting new methods while keeping our theological heritage intact. It’s a great way to say something we all think.
Unfortunately, that doesn’t make it true.
They will know us by our ‘nots’
Do you ever wonder if the world would be more interested in the Church if it didn’t seem like we were against everything?
How amazing would it be if we were not known as pro-life or anti-choice, but as people who loved and cared for unwed mothers and their children? What if we were known not as middle class WASPs, but as generous people sacrificing to help others? And what if we were known not as homophobes, but rather as people who loved the gay community and did everything we could to introduce them to Jesus. And not just so they’d stop being gay. After all, a Christian struggling with homosexuality is no different than a Christian struggling with pride. We all need to deal with our sin. We’re all broken.
We often define ourselves as for or against certain moral frameworks. But God did not call us to morality; He’s called us to himself. If I convince someone to become pro-life or straight and they never meet God then we’ve only gotten part-way (and not the most important part).
Tweet me.
- brian_holt: Landon: "Mommy, you need to call Daddy." Mommy: "Why?" Landon: "I want to tell Daddy that Tyson is a tool."
- brian_holt: @erinpabody you wouldn't.
- brian_holt: @erinpabody It's printer DAEMON...
- brian_holt: It's a boy! We'll have senior, sophomore, and freshman boys in high school (and college). Better save up for grocery money now...
- brian_holt: @aaronalexander I think she goes to Stonebriar...she's newly engaged to one of my friends from Dallas. I don't really know her that well.






